A

Apollo Research Watcher

by Apollo Research PBC

Governance & SecurityDeveloper Tools

Runtime monitoring and blocking for Claude Code and Codex: catch dangerous coding-agent actions before they run

Contact for pricing·Added Sep 19, 2026·Updated Sep 19, 2026
Share:
THE DAILY BRIEF
Apollo Research Watcher

by Apollo Research PBC

Governance & SecurityDeveloper Tools

Runtime monitoring and blocking for Claude Code and Codex: catch dangerous coding-agent actions before they run

Contact for pricing

Watcher is a runtime monitoring and control system from AI-safety lab Apollo Research that records coding-agent sessions, grades each proposed action with LLM monitors, and blocks or escalates risky ones before they execute. It is for security and platform teams that want developers to run Claude Code or Codex with fewer permission prompts but central guardrails.

At a Glance

Category
Governance & Security
Pricing
Contact for pricing
Target Market
CISOs, CTOs, Platform Engineering Teams, Application Security Teams
Deployment
Cloud-first, Self-hosted

Key Features

  • Blocking review
  • Trailing review
  • Custom graders
  • Analyzer dashboard and Slack alerts
  • Self-hosted deployment
  • Fleet rollout via MDM and containers
  • Python SDK and HTTP API

Capabilities

text generation
image generation
video generation
code generation
workflow automation
api access
audio generation
fine tuning
agent orchestration

Use Cases

  • Safer auto-approval for coding agents
  • Preventing data leakage
  • Incident investigation
  • Org-wide agent visibility
  • Self-hosted monitoring for regulated firms

Ideal For

Best For

  • Security teams governing Claude Code and Codex use across engineering
  • Enabling agent auto-approval without giving up guardrails
  • Forensic review of what coding agents actually did in a session
  • Organisations that must keep agent transcripts on their own infrastructure

Not Ideal For

  • Teams standardised on Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf or Gemini CLI: the docs list only Claude Code and Codex as supported agents
  • Buyers who need published pricing or third-party compliance attestations up front: neither the product site nor the security docs list SOC 2 or ISO certifications or prices
  • Latency-sensitive agent workflows where Apollo's own estimate of 6-8% added latency is unacceptable

Market Analysis

Enterprise-gradeResearch-led AI safety

Pros

  • Built by a respected AI-safety evaluation lab with published monitoring research
  • Layered pipeline puts cheap deterministic checks in front of expensive LLM review, limiting cost and latency
  • Self-hosted option with no telemetry and bring-your-own model keys
  • Human escalation and anti-loop protections instead of silent repeated denials

Cons

  • Narrow agent coverage: only Claude Code and Codex, plus remote Claude Code via Claude Tag
  • Codex sessions running under an approval policy that asks about nothing send Watcher no requests, so review can be bypassed by configuration
  • Using LLMs to monitor LLMs invites an arms race; TechCrunch notes a malicious model might trick the monitor
  • Stores full transcripts including source code and any secrets, retained indefinitely by default unless a retention policy is set, and no compliance certifications are documented

Pricing

Watcher (cloud or self-hosted)

Contact for pricing

  • Claude Code and Codex monitoring
  • Blocking and trailing review
  • Cloud hosted in Western Europe or self-hosted

Apollo Research does not publish list pricing; access is arranged by contacting the company, and the February 2026 launch was offered as early access on request. Apollo estimates monitoring adds 3-5% to agent running cost, and self-hosted deployments also carry their own LLM provider bills because the graders run on customer-supplied API keys for OpenAI, Anthropic and Google models.

Security & Compliance

soc2
gdpr
hipaa
iso27001
sso
data residency

THE DAILY BRIEF

Enterprise AI insights for technology and business leaders, twice weekly.

beri.net

Subscribe at beri.net/subscribe for twice-weekly AI insights delivered to your inbox.

LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/rberi  |  X: x.com/rajeshberi

© 2026 Rajesh Beri. All rights reserved.

Watcher is a runtime monitoring and control system from AI-safety lab Apollo Research that records coding-agent sessions, grades each proposed action with LLM monitors, and blocks or escalates risky ones before they execute. It is for security and platform teams that want developers to run Claude Code or Codex with fewer permission prompts but central guardrails.

Watcher is Apollo Research's commercial product for overseeing AI coding agents, launched February 17, 2026 alongside an integration with Tailscale's Aperture AI gateway. Apollo Research, a public-benefit corporation known for evaluating frontier models for scheming and deception, built Watcher to turn its monitoring research into production security. A lightweight client installs hooks into Claude Code and OpenAI's Codex (remote Claude Code sessions are covered through Claude Tag), records every session and trajectory, and routes each proposed tool call through a staged blocking-review pipeline: deterministic always-allow and always-deny thresholds and command rules first, then a cheap triage grader that can only approve, then a deep-review LLM grader that scores risk from 1 to 10, and finally human escalation. Calls are allowed, denied or held for approval, and a separate asynchronous trailing review grades whole trajectories for cross-turn problems such as a wrong diagnosis. Apollo says it detects more than twenty failure modes, including instruction violations, deception, dangerous code execution, data deletion and actions exceeding instructions, and claims 100% recall on critical-severity failures with under 1% false positives on benign tool calls, at an estimated 3-5% added cost and 6-8% added latency. It runs as a cloud service hosted in Western Europe or self-hosted on the customer's own infrastructure with bundled AWS Terraform, customer-supplied LLM keys and no phone-home telemetry. Apollo reports monitoring billions of agent tokens a month at agent-building scale-ups, trading firms and multinational enterprises; pricing is not published.

Ideal Buyer

CISO or application-security lead at a company rolling out Claude Code or Codex who needs guardrails without drowning developers in permission prompts

Key Benefit

Risky agent actions are blocked or escalated before they run, with a full, auditable record of every coding-agent session

At a Glance

Category
Governance & Security
Pricing
Contact for pricing
Target Market
CISOs, CTOs, Platform Engineering Teams, Application Security Teams
Deployment
Cloud-first, Self-hosted

Key Features

  • Blocking review

    Gates each proposed tool call before execution through rules, a triage grader, deep LLM review and optional human approval.

  • Trailing review

    Asynchronously grades whole session trajectories for cross-turn problems and surfaces findings in the Analyzer without slowing the agent down.

  • Custom graders

    Versioned LLM grading rubrics with score dimensions; teams can build their own graders and roll them out for live blocking or on-demand grading.

  • Analyzer dashboard and Slack alerts

    Investigate sessions, review security decisions, manage monitors and organisation settings, and push grading findings to Slack for fast response.

  • Self-hosted deployment

    Run the backend on your own infrastructure with bundled AWS Terraform, your own Postgres and LLM keys, and no telemetry sent to Apollo.

  • Fleet rollout via MDM and containers

    Deploy the client to managed Macs, shared VM images and dev containers with MDM scripts, headless sign-in and organisation API keys.

  • Python SDK and HTTP API

    Programmatic ingest, grading and session queries let teams feed Watcher from custom agents or pipe results into existing security tooling.

Capabilities

text generation
image generation
video generation
code generation
workflow automation
api access
audio generation
fine tuning
agent orchestration

Use Cases

  • Safer auto-approval for coding agents

    Engineering organisations let Claude Code run with fewer permission prompts while Watcher blocks destructive commands and escalates risky calls to a human.

  • Preventing data leakage

    Security teams catch agents attempting to send private code or data to outside destinations and stop the tool call before it executes.

  • Incident investigation

    When an agent deletes files or breaks a build, teams replay the recorded trajectory in the Analyzer to see exactly what happened and why.

  • Org-wide agent visibility

    Paired with Tailscale Aperture's identity-linked gateway logs, security leaders get high-level summaries of agent behaviour while developers see real-time detail.

  • Self-hosted monitoring for regulated firms

    Trading firms and enterprises keep full agent transcripts, including source code, inside their own network by running the self-hosted deployment.

Ideal For

Best For

  • Security teams governing Claude Code and Codex use across engineering
  • Enabling agent auto-approval without giving up guardrails
  • Forensic review of what coding agents actually did in a session
  • Organisations that must keep agent transcripts on their own infrastructure

Not Ideal For

  • Teams standardised on Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf or Gemini CLI: the docs list only Claude Code and Codex as supported agents
  • Buyers who need published pricing or third-party compliance attestations up front: neither the product site nor the security docs list SOC 2 or ISO certifications or prices
  • Latency-sensitive agent workflows where Apollo's own estimate of 6-8% added latency is unacceptable

Integrations

SDK Available
SDK:Python

Deployment

On-Premise

Market Analysis

Enterprise-gradeResearch-led AI safety

Pros

  • Built by a respected AI-safety evaluation lab with published monitoring research
  • Layered pipeline puts cheap deterministic checks in front of expensive LLM review, limiting cost and latency
  • Self-hosted option with no telemetry and bring-your-own model keys
  • Human escalation and anti-loop protections instead of silent repeated denials

Cons

  • Narrow agent coverage: only Claude Code and Codex, plus remote Claude Code via Claude Tag
  • Codex sessions running under an approval policy that asks about nothing send Watcher no requests, so review can be bypassed by configuration
  • Using LLMs to monitor LLMs invites an arms race; TechCrunch notes a malicious model might trick the monitor
  • Stores full transcripts including source code and any secrets, retained indefinitely by default unless a retention policy is set, and no compliance certifications are documented

Pricing

Watcher (cloud or self-hosted)

Contact for pricing

  • Claude Code and Codex monitoring
  • Blocking and trailing review
  • Cloud hosted in Western Europe or self-hosted

Apollo Research does not publish list pricing; access is arranged by contacting the company, and the February 2026 launch was offered as early access on request. Apollo estimates monitoring adds 3-5% to agent running cost, and self-hosted deployments also carry their own LLM provider bills because the graders run on customer-supplied API keys for OpenAI, Anthropic and Google models.

Security & Compliance

soc2
gdpr
hipaa
iso27001
sso
data residency

Connect

Sources

This page was written from 8 sources, 7 on domains other than watcher.apolloresearch.ai.

  1. 1.watcher.apolloresearch.aiwatcher.apolloresearch.aivendor
  2. 2.watcher-docs.apolloresearch.aiblocking and trailing review.md
  3. 3.watcher-docs.apolloresearch.aisecurity.md
  4. 4.watcher-docs.apolloresearch.aisupported agents.md
  5. 5.apolloresearch.aiintroducing watcher for ai oversight
  6. 6.techcrunch.comthe fix for rogue ai agents could be more ai
  7. 7.tailscale.comaperture partners update
  8. 8.siliconangle.comsecure networking startup tailscale launches identity linked
Newsletter

Stay Ahead of the Curve

Weekly enterprise AI insights for technology leaders. No spam, no vendor pitches—unsubscribe anytime.

Subscribe