X

Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6

by Xiaomi

AI Models & APIsDeveloper ToolsAgent Development

MIT-licensed, 1M-context multimodal MoE models that took the top open-weights score on Artificial Analysis at well under $1 per million tokens

Free · Usage-based · Subscription·Added Sep 22, 2026·Updated Sep 22, 2026
Share:
THE DAILY BRIEF
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6

by Xiaomi

AI Models & APIsDeveloper ToolsAgent Development

MIT-licensed, 1M-context multimodal MoE models that took the top open-weights score on Artificial Analysis at well under $1 per million tokens

Free · Usage-based · Subscription

Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6 is a family of open-weight, MIT-licensed multimodal language models, led by the 1.02-trillion-parameter Pro and the 310-billion-parameter Flash, built for coding agents and professional workflows. It is for enterprises that want near-frontier agentic capability they can self-host or buy by API at well under $1 per million tokens.

At a Glance

Category
AI Models & APIs
Pricing
Free, Usage-based, Subscription
Target Market
CTOs, Heads of AI, ML Platform Engineers, Enterprise Developers
Deployment
Open-source, Self-hosted, API-based
Founded
2010
Headquarters
Beijing, China
Team Size
500+

Key Features

  • ✓Trillion-parameter sparse MoE
  • ✓1M-token multimodal context
  • ✓MIT-licensed open weights
  • ✓Open-sourced RL stack
  • ✓Low-cost API and Token Plan
  • ✓Multi-token prediction decoding

Capabilities

✓text generation
✗image generation
✗video generation
✓code generation
✗workflow automation
✓api access
✗audio generation
✓fine tuning
✗agent orchestration

Use Cases

  • •Self-hosted coding agent
  • •Cutting agent pipeline cost
  • •Long multimodal review
  • •Custom agent post-training
  • •Developer coding plans

Ideal For

Best For

  • ✓Enterprises that need a near-frontier model they can run on their own infrastructure under a permissive MIT licence for data-control reasons
  • ✓High-volume coding-agent and agentic workloads where API cost dominates, using Flash at $0.14/$0.28 per million input/output tokens
  • ✓Long-document and multimodal analysis that needs a 1M-token context across text, images, audio and video in one model
  • ✓Teams post-training their own agents with Xiaomi's released RL framework and 7,000+ task environments

Not Ideal For

  • ✗Organizations whose policies bar sending data to a China-based API provider; they can only use MiMo by self-hosting the weights
  • ✗Teams without multi-node GPU clusters who want to self-host Pro; Flash or a third-party host is more realistic
  • ✗Buyers who need contractual SLAs, SOC 2/ISO attestations or data-residency guarantees from the vendor, none of which Xiaomi publishes for the MiMo API
  • ✗Workloads that require the very best coding-agent performance, where Claude Opus 5 still leads on DeepSWE, ProgramBench and Terminal Bench

Market Analysis

Open-weights leaderLow-costDeveloper-first

Pros

  • ✓MIT licence permits commercial use, fine-tuning and fully on-premises deployment
  • ✓Top open-weights intelligence score at launch (Artificial Analysis 46) at a fraction of proprietary API prices
  • ✓1M-token multimodal context and 128K output suit long-horizon agent work
  • ✓Training is unusually transparent, with a technical report, RL environments and a live post-training dashboard that Hacker News commenters praised

Cons

  • ✗Self-hosting Pro needs a multi-node H100/H200-class cluster; Hacker News commenters note even 128GB local machines are out of reach for these models
  • ✗China-origin data and geopolitical concerns rule out the hosted API for some enterprises, a recurring theme in the launch discussion
  • ✗Agent benchmark results are largely vendor-run, it still trails Claude Opus 5 on key coding benchmarks, and HN commenters questioned benchmark overfitting
  • ✗Verbose: Artificial Analysis recorded 140M output tokens to run its index, and Decrypt's review of the earlier V2-Pro flagged token burn and weak frontier math
  • ✗No published SLA, security certifications or data-residency commitments for the MiMo API

Pricing

Open weights (self-host)

$0

  • ✓MIT licence, commercial use allowed
  • ✓Pro, Flash and 9B distilled weights on Hugging Face
  • ✓BF16, FP8 and quantized formats
  • ✓Bring your own GPUs

API: MiMo-V2.6-Pro

$0.435 / 1M input, $0.87 / 1M output tokens

  • ✓Cached input $0.0036 per 1M tokens
  • ✓1M-token context
  • ✓Multimodal input

API: MiMo-V2.6-Flash

$0.14 / 1M input, $0.28 / 1M output tokens

  • ✓Cached input $0.0028 per 1M tokens
  • ✓1M-token context
  • ✓Roughly one-third the cost of Pro

Token Plan Lite

From $6/mo

  • ✓4.1B credits per month
  • ✓For coding tools such as Claude Code, OpenCode, OpenClaw

Token Plan Standard

From $16/mo

  • ✓11B credits per month

Token Plan Pro

From $50/mo

  • ✓38B credits per month

Token Plan Max

From $100/mo

  • ✓82B credits per month

The weights are free under MIT for commercial use, so the real self-hosting cost is GPUs: the Pro model card recommends a two-node H100/H200-class deployment. Xiaomi's API charges $0.435/$0.87 per million input/output tokens for Pro ($0.0036 cached) and $0.14/$0.28 for Flash; Token Plan subscriptions cost $6, $16, $50 and $100 a month for credit bundles, and service is suspended when a monthly quota runs out. No enterprise tier, SLA or data-residency option is published. Artificial Analysis notes the model is verbose, generating 140M output tokens to run its index, which erodes some of the per-token saving.

Security & Compliance

✗soc2
✗gdpr
✗hipaa
✗iso27001
✗sso
✗data residency

THE DAILY BRIEF

Enterprise AI insights for technology and business leaders, weekly.

beri.net

Subscribe at beri.net/subscribe for weekly AI insights delivered to your inbox.

LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/rberi  |  X: x.com/rajeshberi

© 2026 Rajesh Beri. All rights reserved.

Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6 is a family of open-weight, MIT-licensed multimodal language models, led by the 1.02-trillion-parameter Pro and the 310-billion-parameter Flash, built for coding agents and professional workflows. It is for enterprises that want near-frontier agentic capability they can self-host or buy by API at well under $1 per million tokens.

MiMo-V2.6 is the September 2026 release of Xiaomi's MiMo model family, developed by a team led by Luo Fuli, formerly of DeepSeek. Released on September 21, 2026 under the MIT licence, it comprises MiMo-V2.6-Pro, a sparse mixture-of-experts model with 1.02 trillion total and 42 billion active parameters (384 routed experts, 8 active per token), and MiMo-V2.6-Flash, with 310 billion total and 15 billion active, plus a faster Pro-UltraSpeed variant and a 9B model distilled onto Qwen. Both main models accept text, image, audio and video input, offer a 1-million-token context window with up to 128,000 output tokens, and produce text. The release centres on reinforcement learning: Xiaomi says the Pro run covered roughly 750,000 agent trajectories in six days, and it has open-sourced its technical report, RL framework, more than 7,000 task environments and composable mini-harnesses alongside the weights on Hugging Face. Pro scored 46 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, tying for the top open-weights score at launch and ahead of DeepSeek V4.1 Pro and Gemini 3.8 Flash, though Claude Opus 5 still leads on DeepSWE, ProgramBench and Terminal Bench. Xiaomi's API prices Pro at $0.435 per million input tokens and $0.87 output, and Flash at $0.14 and $0.28, while a Token Plan subscription from $6 a month bundles credits for coding tools such as Claude Code, OpenCode and OpenClaw. Self-hosting Pro is a multi-node job: the model card recommends SGLang across two nodes of H100/H200-class GPUs. The line began with MiMo-7B in April 2025; the MiMo-V2-Pro flagship of March 2026 was proprietary before V2.5 and now V2.6 returned the flagship to open weights.

Ideal Buyer

Heads of AI platform at cost-sensitive enterprises who want a near-frontier, permissively licensed model they can either self-host for data control or buy cheaply by API.

Key Benefit

Top-tier open-weights intelligence (Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 46) under the MIT licence, at API prices under $1 per million tokens.

At a Glance

Category
AI Models & APIs
Pricing
Free, Usage-based, Subscription
Target Market
CTOs, Heads of AI, ML Platform Engineers, Enterprise Developers
Deployment
Open-source, Self-hosted, API-based
Founded
2010
Headquarters
Beijing, China
Team Size
500+

Key Features

  • ✓
    Trillion-parameter sparse MoE

    Pro activates 42B of 1.02T parameters per token, balancing frontier-class capability against inference cost.

  • ✓
    1M-token multimodal context

    Pro and Flash both accept text, image, audio and video input with up to 128K output tokens for long-horizon agent tasks.

  • ✓
    MIT-licensed open weights

    Weights on Hugging Face in BF16 and FP8 permit commercial use, fine-tuning and on-premises deployment without royalties.

  • ✓
    Open-sourced RL stack

    Xiaomi released its RL framework, 7,000+ task environments and mini-harnesses, so teams can reproduce or extend agent training.

  • ✓
    Low-cost API and Token Plan

    Pay-as-you-go API from $0.14 per million input tokens, plus $6-$100 monthly credit plans aimed at coding-agent tools.

  • ✓
    Multi-token prediction decoding

    A 5-layer speculative decoder predicts 7 tokens per pass, and a Pro-UltraSpeed variant targets much faster output generation.

Capabilities

✓text generation
✗image generation
✗video generation
✓code generation
✗workflow automation
✓api access
✗audio generation
✓fine tuning
✗agent orchestration

Use Cases

  • •
    Self-hosted coding agent

    Run Flash or Pro on internal GPUs behind the firewall so coding agents work on source code without sending it to a third-party API.

  • •
    Cutting agent pipeline cost

    Move high-volume agent steps from a proprietary frontier model to Flash at $0.14/$0.28 per million tokens where evaluations show quality holds.

  • •
    Long multimodal review

    Analyze long contracts, meeting recordings or video in a single 1M-token context window with one model instead of a pipeline.

  • •
    Custom agent post-training

    Use the released RL environments, framework and harnesses to post-train an in-house model on company-specific workflows and tools.

  • •
    Developer coding plans

    Give engineers a $6-$100 monthly Token Plan that backs Claude Code, OpenCode or OpenClaw sessions with MiMo models.

Ideal For

Best For

  • ✓Enterprises that need a near-frontier model they can run on their own infrastructure under a permissive MIT licence for data-control reasons
  • ✓High-volume coding-agent and agentic workloads where API cost dominates, using Flash at $0.14/$0.28 per million input/output tokens
  • ✓Long-document and multimodal analysis that needs a 1M-token context across text, images, audio and video in one model
  • ✓Teams post-training their own agents with Xiaomi's released RL framework and 7,000+ task environments

Not Ideal For

  • ✗Organizations whose policies bar sending data to a China-based API provider; they can only use MiMo by self-hosting the weights
  • ✗Teams without multi-node GPU clusters who want to self-host Pro; Flash or a third-party host is more realistic
  • ✗Buyers who need contractual SLAs, SOC 2/ISO attestations or data-residency guarantees from the vendor, none of which Xiaomi publishes for the MiMo API
  • ✗Workloads that require the very best coding-agent performance, where Claude Opus 5 still leads on DeepSWE, ProgramBench and Terminal Bench

Deployment

✓On-Premise

Market Analysis

Open-weights leaderLow-costDeveloper-first

Pros

  • ✓MIT licence permits commercial use, fine-tuning and fully on-premises deployment
  • ✓Top open-weights intelligence score at launch (Artificial Analysis 46) at a fraction of proprietary API prices
  • ✓1M-token multimodal context and 128K output suit long-horizon agent work
  • ✓Training is unusually transparent, with a technical report, RL environments and a live post-training dashboard that Hacker News commenters praised

Cons

  • ✗Self-hosting Pro needs a multi-node H100/H200-class cluster; Hacker News commenters note even 128GB local machines are out of reach for these models
  • ✗China-origin data and geopolitical concerns rule out the hosted API for some enterprises, a recurring theme in the launch discussion
  • ✗Agent benchmark results are largely vendor-run, it still trails Claude Opus 5 on key coding benchmarks, and HN commenters questioned benchmark overfitting
  • ✗Verbose: Artificial Analysis recorded 140M output tokens to run its index, and Decrypt's review of the earlier V2-Pro flagged token burn and weak frontier math
  • ✗No published SLA, security certifications or data-residency commitments for the MiMo API

Pricing

Open weights (self-host)

$0

  • ✓MIT licence, commercial use allowed
  • ✓Pro, Flash and 9B distilled weights on Hugging Face
  • ✓BF16, FP8 and quantized formats
  • ✓Bring your own GPUs

API: MiMo-V2.6-Pro

$0.435 / 1M input, $0.87 / 1M output tokens

  • ✓Cached input $0.0036 per 1M tokens
  • ✓1M-token context
  • ✓Multimodal input

API: MiMo-V2.6-Flash

$0.14 / 1M input, $0.28 / 1M output tokens

  • ✓Cached input $0.0028 per 1M tokens
  • ✓1M-token context
  • ✓Roughly one-third the cost of Pro

Token Plan Lite

From $6/mo

  • ✓4.1B credits per month
  • ✓For coding tools such as Claude Code, OpenCode, OpenClaw

Token Plan Standard

From $16/mo

  • ✓11B credits per month

Token Plan Pro

From $50/mo

  • ✓38B credits per month

Token Plan Max

From $100/mo

  • ✓82B credits per month

The weights are free under MIT for commercial use, so the real self-hosting cost is GPUs: the Pro model card recommends a two-node H100/H200-class deployment. Xiaomi's API charges $0.435/$0.87 per million input/output tokens for Pro ($0.0036 cached) and $0.14/$0.28 for Flash; Token Plan subscriptions cost $6, $16, $50 and $100 a month for credit bundles, and service is suspended when a monthly quota runs out. No enterprise tier, SLA or data-residency option is published. Artificial Analysis notes the model is verbose, generating 140M output tokens to run its index, which erodes some of the per-token saving.

Security & Compliance

✗soc2
✗gdpr
✗hipaa
✗iso27001
✗sso
✗data residency

Connect

Sources

This page was written from 10 sources, 10 on domains other than mimo.xiaomi.com.

  1. 1.venturebeat.com — better than deepseek xiaomis mimo v2 6 pro debuts as the top
  2. 2.huggingface.co — MiMo V2.6 Pro RL
  3. 3.huggingface.co — XiaomiMiMo
  4. 4.artificialanalysis.ai — mimo v2 6 pro
  5. 5.mimo.mi.com — token plan
  6. 6.en.wikipedia.org — Xiaomi MiMo
  7. 7.en.wikipedia.org — Xiaomi
  8. 8.hn.algolia.com — 49792730
  9. 9.decrypt.co — xiaomi mimo v2 pro review so good mistaken deepseek v4
  10. 10.mycodingplan.com — xiaomi mimo token plan
Newsletter

Stay Ahead of the Curve

Weekly enterprise AI insights for technology leaders. No spam, no vendor pitches—unsubscribe anytime.

Subscribe