If your credit team runs on NetNow, BlackLine now owns the vendor holding your credit applications, trade references and bank verifications — and its published terms promise no export of any of it. NetNow's terms of service let either party end the agreement "with or without reason or prior notification," and state that "it's your responsibility to keep copies of Your Content." BlackLine's September 21 announcement said nothing about NetNow's standalone product, its existing customers or an integration timeline. Pull your files this week. Then get three commitments in writing — an export clause, a named ERP connector and a price hold — before NetNow is repackaged inside BlackLine's Invoice-to-Cash suite.
What BlackLine Bought, and What It Left Unsaid
BlackLine bought the decision that happens before an invoice exists: whether a new business customer gets credit at all. NetNow digitises credit applications, trade references, risk assessment, fraud detection and ongoing credit monitoring, according to the announcement, and BlackLine is adding it to Invoice-to-Cash, its receivables suite. "Credit is one of the earliest and most consequential financial decisions a company makes in the customer relationship, yet the process remains remarkably manual for many organizations," said Andy Lilley, who runs Invoice-to-Cash at BlackLine.
The price was not disclosed. Wilson Sonsini and Blake, Cassels & Graydon advised BlackLine and Lightning Partners advised NetNow, per Investing.com. Nothing in the announcement tells a NetNow customer what happens to the product they pay for.
What NetNow does is more operational than "AI credit risk" suggests. Its homepage says it connects to "over 12,000 financial institutions for real-time bank reference verification" and is "trusted by over 85,000 businesses worldwide" — a vendor figure that does not separate paying credit teams from the applicants who fill in its forms. Its testimonials come from Ashby Lumber, Cutting Edge Countertops and Convoy Supply, and the first industry it lists is lumber and building materials.
The AI sits in two places. The fraud module checks domain ownership, phone numbers, IP addresses, EINs and SSNs, and routes each application to "automated approval or flagging for manual review." The monitoring module markets "AI-powered analysis of credit risks," "predictive modeling" and "real-time alerts based on risk thresholds."
So the data at stake is not a dashboard. It is signed applications, guarantor identity details, bank verifications and the reference history behind every credit limit you have set.
NetNow's Terms Promise Almost Nothing That Survives a Sale
NetNow's published terms, last revised October 21, 2024, give a customer no export right, no notice period and no price protection. Read in one sitting, they say:
- Termination: "Either party, be it you or us, can conclude this Terms of Service either with or without reason or prior notification."
- Your data: "It's your responsibility to keep copies of Your Content. NetNow isn't responsible for any content losses or damages." No clause obliges NetNow to return or export anything.
- Price: "prices may change without prior notice."
- The terms themselves: changes "become effective as soon as they are published."
- Assignment: the only assignment language binds you. The terms "cannot be assigned, transferred, or sublicensed without prior authorization from NetNow." Nothing restricts NetNow.
- Liability: capped at the larger of what you paid in the past twelve months or $100.
- Venue: Canadian law, courts of Ontario.
- Usage data: "Systems Data" — aggregated, de-identified data about how the service is used — is "NetNow's exclusive property."
The privacy policy was revised on July 29, 2026, less than two months before the deal, and already permits sharing personal information "in the event of any reorganization, merger, sale" of the business. The same shape showed up when Superhuman bought Fathom: the documents in force on closing day are what you actually hold.
Now the strongest case against worrying. These are ordinary mid-market click-through terms, and BlackLine has every commercial reason to keep NetNow's customers. On its Q2 2026 earnings call, BlackLine credited dollar-based net revenue retention of 102.4% partly to "cross-sell of invoice to cash" — and NetNow's installed base is exactly that cross-sell pool. BlackLine also does not shut acquisitions overnight: nine months after it bought WiseLayer, WiseLayer's own site still markets its accruals and payroll agents.
All true. But an incentive is not a contract, and the terms are what you will be holding if the incentive changes. If you signed an order form or MSA that overrides the online terms, that paper governs — read it before anything else.
Why an Enterprise-Focused Owner Puts NetNow's Long-Tail ERPs at Risk
NetNow was built for distributors on mid-market and industry-specific ERPs; BlackLine's growth is pointed at large enterprises and SAP. On the Q2 2026 call, CEO Owen Ryan said the pipeline is "skewing more towards mega enterprise and enterprise than it is mid-market," CFO Patrick Villanova said "SAP was 26% of revenue," and Ryan said "nearly 90% of net new business this quarter landed directly on platform pricing," which "offers unlimited users." Villanova also described churn in "the lower mid-market cohort" that BlackLine expects to ease as it exits 2026.
Put that next to NetNow's integrations page, which lists ten ERPs: Acumatica, Microsoft Dynamics 365, DMSI (a "specialized integration for lumber & building materials"), ECI, Epicor, Infor, JD Edwards, NetSuite, QuickBooks and Sage. An August 2026 ERP Research review names BlackLine's integrations as SAP, NetSuite, Oracle, Dynamics 365 Finance, Sage Intacct and Acumatica, and says it documents connections to "more than 30 systems overall." DMSI, ECI and QuickBooks are not on that named list. NetNow's own FAQ names SAP among its integrations; its integrations page does not.
That is the gap. The connectors an enterprise-focused owner is least likely to prioritise are the ones NetNow's lumber-yard customers run.
Pricing points the same way. NetNow publishes no price list — its FAQ says pricing "varies based on your needs and usage" and that it charges no implementation fees. The same ERP Research review puts BlackLine contracts at roughly $17,500 to $340,000 a year, "quote-based by module and entity count." Nobody has said how NetNow will be priced inside BlackLine. But a module sold on module-and-entity logic is a different purchase from a tool a small credit department bought on usage.
What Happened the Last Time an AR Suite Bought a Point Tool
The pattern is consistent: the product becomes a module, and the module's owner can change again. BlackLine is the first precedent. It bought Rimilia, a UK AI cash-application platform, in October 2020 for $150 million in cash — $120 million at close and up to $30 million in earnouts — promising "the scale to further drive adoption of Rimilia's platform." Today rimilia.com 301-redirects to BlackLine's Cash Application page inside Invoice-to-Cash. That is not a failure; it is what integration looks like. It is also the end of a standalone product.
The closer precedent is Credit2B. Billtrust bought it in April 2018 for "business credit reports, online credit applications, machine learning credit scores and credit analytics capabilities" — close to NetNow's feature list. Four years later Billtrust itself was taken private by EQT at $9.50 a share, closing in December 2022. A credit team that bought Credit2B before 2018 has since watched its vendor change hands twice. Absorption is the gentle version; when Klaviyo bought Agency, the product was simply wound down.
BlackLine may not be NetNow's last owner either. SAP offered $66 a share — nearly $4.5 billion — on June 18, 2025, and BlackLine rejected it, Reuters reported. In March 2026 BlackLine signed a cooperation agreement with Engaged Capital that expanded its board to 14 and put Storm Duncan on it and on its Strategic Committee. Days later a second fund, Fivespan Partners, disclosed a 5.1% stake and said it would engage on "mergers and acquisitions strategy."
Nobody has announced a sale. But a vendor under that much pressure over M&A is one whose subsidiaries' contracts you should write as though they will change hands again.
A Risk Score Is Not a Reason Under Regulation B
If your team declines an applicant on the strength of an AI risk score, the legal duty to explain that decline is yours, not NetNow's — and "the score was too low" does not satisfy it. Trade credit is the payment terms a supplier extends to a business customer, such as net-30 on a truckload of lumber, and Regulation B reaches it. Under 12 CFR 1002.9(a)(3)(ii), a creditor extending trade credit must notify the applicant of the action taken "within a reasonable time," and give a written statement of reasons if the applicant asks in writing within 60 days. The Equal Credit Opportunity Act says such a statement counts only if it contains "the specific reasons for the adverse action taken." Regulation B's own specificity paragraph is written for consumer notices, but it shows what regulators mean: a statement that the applicant "failed to achieve a qualifying score on the creditor's credit scoring system" is insufficient.
Adverse action, as Regulation B defines it, is a refusal to grant credit "in substantially the amount or on substantially the terms requested" — unless the applicant accepts a counteroffer — or an unfavourable change in an account's terms that does not affect "all or substantially all of a class of the creditor's accounts." Actions tied to an account's own delinquency or default are excluded. So a limit cut triggered by a monitoring alert, rather than by the customer paying late, can be adverse action. That matters for a product whose pitch is "real-time alerts based on risk thresholds."
The rule has not been loosened on this point. The CFPB's April 2026 rewrite of Regulation B, effective July 21, 2026, went after disparate-impact liability, "discouragement" and special purpose credit programs; the specific-reasons text in § 1002.9(b)(2) is still in the regulation.
Competitors are selling against exactly this gap. Billtrust's Agentic Credit Lines, launched March 3, 2026, promises "audit-ready credit limit recommendations with transparent rationale." HighRadius says its credit software "recommends credit decisions with transparent risk factors, supporting data, and confidence scores." Those are vendor claims, not audits. But they frame the question to put to BlackLine: when NetNow flags an application, can it tell you why, in words you could put in a letter?
What to Do Before NetNow Is Repackaged
The playbook is the one we laid out when Beacon bought Haize Labs: secure the data first, then negotiate while the new owner still wants your goodwill.
This Week:
- Export everything you would need to defend a credit decision. Signed applications, guarantor details, trade and bank reference responses, bureau pulls and the analyst's decision notes go into your ERP's customer master or your document system, not a shared drive. Note which records export cleanly and which need a support ticket; that gap is your negotiating list.
- Find your paper. If you signed an order form or MSA, read its termination, data-return and assignment language; it overrides the online terms. If you didn't, you are on the terms quoted above.
- Pull every decline and limit reduction from the last 60 days and check you can produce specific, written reasons for each. Sixty days is the window Regulation B gives a trade-credit applicant to ask.
This Month:
- Ask NetNow, in writing, for four things: a date through which the standalone product will be sold and supported; a maintenance commitment for your specific ERP connector; data export on termination in a documented format, with at least 90 days' notice; and your current price held through the next renewal.
- Ask whether the SOC 2 Type 2 report NetNow's FAQ cites will be reissued under BlackLine's control environment, and when. Your auditors will ask the same question.
- Test the reasons. Take three recent declines and ask the tool for the principal reasons behind each. If all it produces is a score, write the reasons into your own credit policy so an analyst can.
Before Renewal:
- Price one alternative so the renewal is a real negotiation. Billtrust and HighRadius both sell AI credit-limit recommendations; HighRadius's credit page names SAP, Oracle, Microsoft Dynamics, NetSuite and Infor. Confirm your ERP is supported before you take a demo — and remember Billtrust is itself PE-owned, so no option is free of ownership risk.
- If you are a BlackLine customer being offered the new credit module, keep it off your Invoice-to-Cash order until it is native to your ERP, priced on the order form and able to produce a reason statement. Buying a roadmap line is how you end up paying for it twice.
The Bottom Line
The credit application is the one receivables record that exists before the customer does in your ERP, which is why it so often lives in a separate tool the credit manager picked. That makes it the most portable data you own, and the easiest to lose when that tool is absorbed. Rimilia became a page on BlackLine's site. Credit2B became part of a company that was then sold again. NetNow is at the start of the same path — at the one moment its new owner wants your goodwill most.
BlackLine chose the acquisition. The export clause is the one part of this deal you still get to write.
Continue Reading
- Beacon Bought Haize Labs. Who Red-Teams Your Agents Now?
- Bending Spoons Closed Airtable in 31 Days. Miro Says Q4.
- Klaviyo Bought Agency. The Product Dies August 31.
- Valsoft Bought Square 9. Who Funds the Next Model?
- Superhuman Bought Fathom. Only Past Calls Keep Fathom's Terms.
- DBS Put 1,500 Bankers on Agents. The 30% Is a Goal.